By Tunde Agboke, Founder, Mshindo Policy Lab (MPL), in collaboration with Debo Folorunsho, Executive Director, Society for Africans in the Diaspora (SAiD Institute)
This is the first article in Diaspora by Design,a four-part series, framing the diaspora as strategic knowledge infrastructure, developed by the Mshindo Policy Lab (MPL) in collaboration with the SAiD Institute ahead of the 2025 United Nations General Assembly. Each piece challenges dominant diaspora narratives and builds the case for a new statecraft grounded in distributed African power.
Across African policy circles, the term “diaspora engagement” has become a well-worn phrase. It appears in presidential speeches, national development plans, diaspora ministries, and multilateral forums alike. Yet beneath this surface of rhetorical embrace lies a structural paradox: while diaspora is publicly celebrated, it remains largely untapped. Most African states continue to approach diaspora through a narrow lens, focusing on financial remittances, cultural pride, or symbolic returns, while ignoring the far more powerful resource embedded within diaspora communities: knowledge.
This article argues that African and Afro-descendant diaspora professionals represent an unseen engine of strategic capacity positioned across global systems: technologists, policy experts, public finance specialists, infrastructure planners. But this engine remains unseen, not because it doesn’t exist, but because African states have not built the infrastructure to see it. The problem is not one of talent scarcity; it is one of state architecture design.
U.S.-based entities like the Information Technology Senior Management Forum (ITSMF), Black Professionals in International Affairs, and FOSTR. ITSMF is an executive development organization for Black tech leaders, nurturing senior-level professionals in digital innovation. BPIA is a global network of foreign policy and multilateral affairs professionals, connecting Black experts across diplomacy, negotiation, and international public service. FOSTR, meanwhile, is a curated platform for Africans and allies with Big Tech experience, positioned precisely in the diaspora talent node, yet absent from formal engagement by African states. These are not abstract or marginal groups. They are dense nodes of African-origin expertise capable of contributing directly to national systems, but they are nearly invisible in state-facing policy discourse. Their members are not asking to be included—they’re simply not being engaged.
Organizations explicitly designed to broker knowledge, such as the SAiD Institute, encounter a similar gap. The challenge isn’t political interest but institutional absence. Diaspora is still treated as external to the state, rather than a strategic extension of it.
MPL proposes a new strategic category: knowledge remittance. This is not symbolic. It calls for protocols, platforms, and incentives that allow African states to absorb diaspora expertise into policy and infrastructure design. Until this shift happens, the continent will continue exporting talent and importing ideas, when it could be doing the reverse.
Ghana’s Year of Return offers an instructive case. As a narrative intervention, it was masterful; galvanizing cultural pride, tourism, and symbolic reconnection. Some programs, including short-term fellowships, aimed to deepen ties with the diaspora but as a policy project, it stopped short of treating diaspora as thought partners. No national platform was built to translate that energy into policy co-production, infrastructure planning, or governance transformation. It was a cultural celebration, not a system shift. For African states serious about transformation, symbolism must yield to infrastructure.
What’s needed is not more diaspora ministries or symbolic outreach. What’s needed is statecraft. African governments must build the connective tissue: platforms, protocols, and incentives that allow diaspora knowledge to be systematically integrated into public systems. This is not about asking people to come back. It is about recognizing that the global dispersion of African talent is not a loss to be mourned, but an infrastructure to be activated.
And the timing is critical. U.S. foreign policy is shifting away from aid and toward commercial self-interest. This includes deep cuts to development budgets, increased tariff pressure, and a growing emphasis on profit over partnership. In this context, African states can no longer afford to treat diaspora engagement as a cultural gesture. Knowledge remittance has become a geopolitical necessity.
Institutions like MPL and SAiD are built to model this logic. It is time African states followed suit. Until they learn to see the engine, it will remain unused.
To connect or collaborate | www.mshindopolicylab.com | Newsletter | Connect@MshindoPolicyLab.com